The plaintiff in court told the reason for contacting the defendant, pointing to a mechanical malfunction of his car's engine. He described how the defendant carried out repairs, said how pleased he was when he received the car (it started up with joy). Later, the plaintiff stated that after the defendant's car was repaired, he did not use the car after which he began to complain about increased fuel consumption and loss of traction, blaming the defendant for this. An employee of an outside organization who fixed all the malfunctions of the plaintiff's car was questioned in court as a witness. When the court asked the witness when the substandard mechanical repairs performed by the defendant were revealed, the witness said that IMMEDIATELY, when the engine was started for the first time. As a result: Judge Dmitriev Vadim Viktorovich intentionally terminated the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. And referring to the alleged admission of guilt by the defendant's representative and based only on the articles without specifying the GUILT or FOR WHAT, he made an unjustified decision. In addition, when one participant was unwell, the trial was not stopped and medical assistance was not provided. In order to avoid anyone getting into a similar situation, immediately request the RECUSAL of Judge V.V. Dmitriev when considering your case. According to Article 287 of the CPC and Article 271 of the CPC of the Republic of Belarus, an audio recording was personally conducted at an open meeting.

See original · Русский

Антон Бойко

Level 2 Local Expert

The judge and the prosecutor are very competent, everything is on the case and most importantly they listen and understand the situation (Understand) Thank you for your work.

See original · Русский

Андрей

Level 3 Local Expert

Do not call the numbers, One is given to the apartment, the other does not exist

See original · Русский