Level of training:master's, bachelor's, postgraduate education, specialist degree, doctorate
Form of teaching:external studies, evening, remote, correspondence, full-time, part-time
Training areas:human resource management, informatics, system analysis and control, protecting the environment, applied mechanics, engineering physics, electrical power engineering, materials science and technology of new materials, electrical engineering, electromechanics and electrotechnics, electronic design and technology, thermal engineering, chemical engineering and biotechnology, electronics and microelectronics, telecommunications, statistics, commerce, economics, management, jurisprudence, sociology, social work, psychology, political science, history, journalism, philology, cultural studies, mathematics, natural history, mechanics, chemistry, pedagogy, ecology, applied mathematics, physics, biology, automation and control, radio engineering, metrology, standardization and certification
Of course, I am subjective, but the university is excellent. I remember my student years very warmly. She graduated from the Faculty of History in 2022. The teachers gave excellent humanitarian education and helped in everything. They provided excellent archaeological practice. No matter what, the quality of education is super. I had good relations with my classmates.
See original · Русский
Карина Кручинецкая
Level 3 Local Expert
June 17
This year she received her second higher education
I can say about the Department of Foreign Languages - a complete bottom ( sorry for the expression )
Thanks to the teacher Fatyanova Irina (unfortunately I do not remember the patronymic), who gave a good vocabulary from the first year and Reznikova Irina Romanovna, who also taught not only interesting subjects, but also valuable material without water.
I studied on a paid basis and some teachers bothered to "solve university issues" thanks to couples. I am generally silent about graduation papers, the thesis, which was not designed by my classmate at all, for some reason was rated at 90 points, after 3 minutes (we have one scientific hand) I pass in perfect design, but as they tell me "it was not finalized enough" and this is "a great teacher" Trofimova Elena, who not only did the couple not lead the senior courses, motivating them with "university accreditation", but they also could not motivate the low scores in any way.
Dear teachers of the Department of Foreign Languages, have you completed your work, I hope?
Or students still continue to pay regularly for tuition, as required by your "great" dean's office, which is not familiar with the high cost in any way.
I hope all these "interim officers" will leave and finally highly qualified specialists will come who will give knowledge and OBJECTIVELY evaluate!
See original · Русский
1
Татьяна Щербань
Level 2 Local Expert
November 12
The Department of English Philology, the quality of teaching leaves much to be desired, and the assessment system seems oppressive and unfair, especially towards students who do not have family ties with teachers. This creates an atmosphere of distrust and demotivates students. This situation is significantly influenced by the head of the department, who seems to contribute to creating an atmosphere of unfair assessment and poor teaching quality.