Sud Minskogo rayona

Rate this place

23 reviews

Level 10 Local Expert
April 8
The terrible injustice and cowardice of the Judge, in front of the arrogance of the aponent's Lawyer, who was able to intimidate the judge by appealing the decision, shouted at the judge. The judge does not think about making a FAIR decision. The judge is thinking about how to make a decision that is CONVENIENT for her career, so that there are fewer appeals. Shame on you … You can't take a job like this because you're cowardly.… The judge during the trial shared her personal information - that she was late for home and needed to pick up the child from kindergarten, called her husband… Aponent's scandalous lawyer was able to use all this as leverage. That's why a judge puts on a robe - to be NOT a WOMAN, but a Judge. And leave everything personal at the door. Briefly about the case - the house has 2 owners, MO. Owner A, permanently resided in another city. Coming every 2 years. Owner B has a residence permit in the Russian Federation and also does not live permanently in the house. Owner B starts changing some locks without warning A. Owner A notices the replacement and asks for the keys. Owner B denies replacement (recorded in telephone correspondence) Owner A notifies that then the locks will have to be replaced and after that Owner A is ready to transfer the new set to owner B. All agree. The owner came to the house. The parents of owner B were there (registered in another village) The owner made a planned change of those locks to which he did not have access. The replaced locks were not the main and only ones. These locks were the second ones on the doors (spare) and were not closed by owner A and owner B. Thus, the owner B was not deprived by owner A of the opportunity to get into the house. Owner A asked the parents of owner B when he plans to come from the Russian Federation and will be in the house? To transfer keys ( recorded on video). The parents of owner B said that owner B would contact owner A by phone when he arrived. Owner B - after learning from his parents about the change of locks. Relative B, being in the Russian Federation and not coming to the Republic of Belarus, files a LAWSUIT - stating that he cannot get into the house and Relative A does not give the keys.... At the same time, the owner of B pretends that he does NOT KNOW that Relative A is ready to give him the keys. Partner B, does not request keys from partner A. Owner B does not send his representative to the owner A to receive the keys ( to the house ). The owner is in the house all the time And I'm ready to hand over the keys, on demand. But there is no one to hand over the keys to, since brother-in-law B is in the Russian Federation, on a residence permit, pays taxes in the Russian Federation and maintains an individual entrepreneur there. And the COURT will satisfy this claim..... The trial takes place in several sessions - about 4-5. The defendant (his colleague A) bears the costs of a lawyer. And no one compensates for it. A STUPID and unfair precedent has been created - now ALL joint owners, without allocated ownership shares, can file lawsuits, simply because THEY WANTED TO, without grounds. I will not specify the judge's last name, the Chairman of the Minsk Regional Court and the relevant persons can easily find out for themselves.
See original · Русский
1
Level 4 Local Expert
May 28
You are a lousy court, I wish everyone to file a complaint against you to the Supreme Court and the administration.The president's judges do not work there, the assistant judges are not competent staff.It's humiliating to be so illiterate.
See original · Русский
Level 3 Local Expert
February 10
I thank Judge Guryeva for her attitude. After the hearing, I wanted to live.May God grant you good health.I wish there were more people like you and the prosecutor, but I don't know your last name.
See original · Русский
1
Level 2 Local Expert
September 2, 2023
The most terrible judge Mazur in and I can't write with a capital letter!An incompetent, irresponsible, disliking judge, a judge who does not listen to the assessment of expertise, leading the court for herself! DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE POSITION!
See original · Русский
7
3
Level 2 Local Expert
August 17, 2024
I thank Judge Mazur E. And for his humanity, thank you very much.
See original · Русский
2
Level 5 Local Expert
November 25, 2024
There are many disadvantages, I have not seen any advantages
See original · Русский
Level 3 Local Expert
July 25, 2024
It's a great place, they almost planted it
See original · Русский
8
1
Level 5 Local Expert
August 12, 2024
That is all right.
See original · Русский
1
January 15, 2020
I, Vyacheslav Stepanovich Osos, born in 1958, worked in the Housing and Communal Services of the Minsk district from 04.05.1993 (ave. No. 9k of 04.05. 1993) to 07/31/2000 (ave. No. 47k of 31.07. 2000) as the head of the site and was transferred to SUE Zaslavl Vodokanal as chief engineer from 01.08. 2000 (ave. No. 18-k from 01. 08. 2000) to 31.12.2002. These periods are confirmed by an entry in my work record. During the reargonization of these enterprises, personal income accounts for 1998 and 2000 were lost. I have submitted an application to establish the fact of receiving a salary for a certain period. To provide to the Department of Labor, Employment and Social Protection of the Minsk district Executive Committee for the appointment of an age pension for me. I was refused to initiate a civil case for No. 7394 without any explanation. I received this reply by mail in which Judge P. A. Khomich made such a decision. No suggestions and no solutions, that's how they helped me. Thanks!
See original
10
8
Level 5 Local Expert
August 4, 2022
I was deprived of my parental rights without my knowledge, the registration letters did not arrive
See original
1
Level 26 Local Expert
August 14, 2020
Shame on such a court that stands on the side of the dictatorial regime and judges people maimed and beaten by riot police. Shame and shame, I do not recommend seeking justice in this place.
See original
26
18
Level 18 Local Expert
September 16, 2019
A good modern building, no problems with Parking, during breaks you can take a walk in Loshitsky Park))
See original
11
12
Level 9 Local Expert
November 27, 2019
Parking is convenient. Everything is convenient in the building itself...well thought out....
See original
6
8
Level 10 Local Expert
June 29, 2020
I often visit this court for work, a decent court, a good room.
See original
6
3
Level 4 Local Expert
November 12, 2021
And who are the judges?...
See original
7
Level 30 Local Expert
August 7, 2020
An unpleasant place, people are charged with negativity a lot
See original
9
1
Level 17 Local Expert
February 2, 2021
Conveniently located.
See original
1
Level 13 Local Expert
December 29, 2019
It's beautiful on the outside, but it's better not to get inside.
See original
7
4
Level 14 Local Expert
September 7, 2020
I was a defendant in court, I didn't like it
See original
7
Level 10 Local Expert
March 28, 2020
A great young team!
See original
1
7
Level 6 Local Expert
February 17, 2021
The most terrible place.
See original
3
1
Level 8 Local Expert
January 4, 2020
Polite judges, secretaries. Everything is clear
See original
5
12
Level 6 Local Expert
October 8, 2019
The court is like a court.
See original
12
9